Saturday, August 15, 2009

It's not a God n Science thing

S: “Who’s superior – light or dark?”
C: “Off course! Light”
S: “But dark is the source of curiosity, isn’t it?”
C: “Yeah! (stammering ...), but (stammered again ...)”
[ The war had already begun between the conscious(C) and the sub-conscious(S). ]

The question was simple, might be utmost trivial if one was already convinced with age old theories without pouring a second thought onto it. Stepping back was now a complete ignorance (it’s not like I don’t like ignorance but at the cost of ego, never!), so I decided to dive into and try to figure out the exact dimensions of this horrendous yet pragmatic query.
Who are we to judge the supremacy of light without even letting the power of darkness known? Dark is not the ignorance but in contrast is the source of curiosity. Who are we to affix it to devil, to demon when it gifted us the place called ‘universe’. Light is just a part of whole, whole that is made up of dark, dark, and incessant dark only. What we can see, we can perceive but what about the things that are still hidden in the dark? They are the future pillar, they are the part of next civilization and next to them too yet they are securely preserved in those dark creeks.
Digging deep I took yet another harsher verdict. A verdict of going against the universal perception of god. God as a source of light. For me, God’s not what is known but what’s still unknown, God is what you can’t compare, you can’t see and you can’t feel. Then how come he is a source of light? Instead he seems to be the creator of dark and virtually creator of everything that exists, whether you can perceive it or not. Science on the other hand is the source of light, a systematic study which picks things from the dark and frame them as knowledge.
God is a superset of everything with Consciousness, Sub-consciousness and Un-Consciousness as its subsets. Dark on the other hand is what a conscious mind see, a sub-conscious mind perceive and an un-conscious mind feel. The only thing that could supersede God (Or the holy concept of god; for rational ones) would be then Dark only. This dark is the source of curiosity which ultimately leads to inspiration and then to innovation which brings light and tagged as Science (So humane, isn’t it?). All those bifurcations and relations that confound us and battling around in the core of our heart are the natural by-product of our wisdom, our ego and our judgements and our part that we call ‘knowledge’. All good, bad, evil are associated with science, with light. Dark know nothing.
You can prove what exists but how can you prove what does not exist that it does not exist? And that’s what dark offer - ‘God’ - a big ‘O’. May be bigger than the whole universe, may be bigger than the whole whole. It's darkness that gives us hope to discover a new what, a new where and a new why at every moment and at every single second to make it running what we call ‘Life’. We are constantly working on pouring everything in light, giving explanation to everything, picking it out of dark and out of god's hand.
This is what our ancestors did; whatever they could prove they tagged it as knowledge, rest everything was 'GOD'.

4 comments:

Shweta Tiwari said...

OMG!!..it went over my head..a bouncer for me..all that i could understand was u were trying to prove dark as god..and later on unknown as god..if this is what it meant..then the idea is superb..otherwise..i should not give any comment..coz..i ahevnot understud this..

Mukesh Kothiyal said...

off course!!
It wnt over my head too :D
kiddin, I knw d flw ws a bit jittery, bt dis is hw i feel, its no way i follow its jst wht i flt like!!
bt its nt jst philosophy, its more on practical part so atleast gv it a try!!

Mukesh Kothiyal said...

@Shwet
n besides explainin wats dark or wats unknown(r they reely diff??) itself need more thn an article space! :)

Mukesh Kothiyal said...

@karim
Thanks dear for hoppin in and for boosting...
hope to see yaa again :)